Ai-enhanced Digital Belonging: An Exploration of Identity, Trust, And Algorithmic Affectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17903236Keywords:
Digital Belonging, Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Affectivity, search for identity, Organization Trust, Communication EthicsAbstract
This paper explores the transformation of belonging, identity, and trust within AI-driven digital communication environments. In the digital age, identities constructed in social media and online networks have evolved beyond representational forms into algorithmic emotional outputs. Within the framework of “algorithmic affectivity,” this study examines how artificial intelligence influences and redefines individuals’ sense of digital belonging.
Drawing upon Shoshana Zuboff’s theory of surveillance capitalism, Vamık Volkan’s identity formations, and Sherry Turkle’s concept of the digital self, the study employs qualitative analysis to investigate how language, interaction patterns, and algorithmic systems generate emotional dependencies in digital communities. Findings indicate that the feeling of belonging is increasingly mediated by AI-driven interactions rather than human-to-human communication.
The paper argues that belonging has become a technologically mediated emotion, trust is now grounded in algorithmic prediction, and identity is continuously reshaped through data flows. This reconfiguration signals the emergence of an “era of ethical affectivity” within the field of communication studies, urging scholars to reconsider the emotional and moral dimensions of AI-mediated social life.
References
Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989.
Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vu, T., Karahalios, K., … Sandvig, C. (2015). “I always assumed that I wasn’t really that close to [her]”: Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 153–162.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot Rights. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
Meshi, D., Tamir, D. I., & Heekeren, H. R. (2015). The emerging neuroscience of social media. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 771–782.
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
Volkan, V. D. (2017). Large-Group Psychology: Racism, Societal Divisions, Narcissistic Leaders and Who We Are Now.Phoenix Publishing House.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 PEARSON JOURNAL

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
